Re: source package question
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: source package question
- From: Johannes Rohr <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:36:36 +0200
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Craig Small's message of "Thu, 19 Jun 2003 02:50:06 +0200")
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
email@example.com (Craig Small) writes:
> The directory name doesn't matter that much as things like dpkg-source
> seem to handle most of these quite well. The fact that the archive
> extracts out to that directory means the orig.tar.gz is being created.
> I generally never let that happen by always renaming the upstream tar
> file to orig.tar.gz as my first step.
> eg, mv LPRng-3.4.20.tar.gz lprng_3.4.20.orig.tar.gz
... which works only for tar.gz. Is there any chance of having
[optional] bzip2 support added to dpkg-dev & friends support in the
future? The space savings are _considerable_ and bzip2 is not exactly
bleeding edge anymore.
I know that bzip2 is somewhat slower, but it still would save me time,
given that downloads would be faster. (I'm behind a 64K ISDN dialup).