[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unofficial package tips



On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Steve Kemp wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> > BTW never forget that external archive can be as dangerous as usefull.
> > Warn ALWAYS the user that is not an official repository and don't use it
> > only for your own "glory".. help the official maintainer with what it will
> > come out of its usage.
>
>   Glory is an interesting choice of word.

I choose it carefully to underline what the Social Contract states:
"Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software"

basically (atleast in my specific case) when i started debian-ipv6 archive
i did with a specific purpoues to give people something more, exactly like
you do. But personally i do not care of getting "credits" for it. I am
much more glad to share the credits inside the team since it is a work
done by several people and developers (as you can read by my signature of
which I am extremely proud :-) ).

>   Surely this is a win win situation for everybody?  Any glory is really
>  going to upstream (OK me in my case) for writing the code
>  which others want, not to the packager, or maintainer of the debs.

I agree with you. my concern is that sometimes people do not see that far
inside what they have. not blaming anyone here but look at X for example.
I did never see someone on irc saying: "hey cool they released X4.3 ...
great job they did" but only things like: "hey Branden X4.3 is out  when
will you package it?". Probably we often forget that we are "only" (well
me not yet :-) ) a layer between the upstream and the user.

>   I guess the only tricky part is knowing when a package is sufficiently
>  popular that it should go into Debian for real.  I've not reached
>  that point with any of my little .debs, but I can imagine others
>  have.

IMHO even the smallest bit is important. probably we are lacking a way to
understand how users make use of that bit and understand how mush usefull
is or not...

-- 
drac (1.11-7) unstable; urgency=low
  * added IPv6 patch from the great IPv6 Team

 -- Noel Koethe <noel@debian.org>  Sun,  9 Feb 2003 19:33:00 +0100



Reply to: