[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath



On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:18:18AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 09 May 2002, Marc Haber wrote:
> > >Yes, for libraries. Plugins may use/need rpath.

> > What exactly is the definition of a plugin in this context?

> dynamic objects used/usable *only* by a certain program/library. E.g. the
> apache plugins (plugin for app), the SASL plugins (plugin for a library);
> Also linked at runtime using dlopen() or something like that.  IMHO anyway.

This does not follow.  If it's a plugin, you don't link against it, so
rpath is irrelevant.  If it's something you link against, it's a
library, and policy requires that it go in one of the system paths:
therefore, rpath is unnecessary.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpAbCmC4l4MX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: