Re: lib sdl
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> What Christian Marillat has been doing was surely done with good intentions
> in mind; and indeed I have already asked him for any help he wishes to
> provide; but there were some problems/issues.
>
> (btw: didn't you ask yourself
> "why Christian Marillat's package is not Debian?")
Because I known why it has not been in Debian so far.
>
>
> Let us review the history of mplayer-in-debian (afaik it)
>
> 0) mplayer has a debian directory in CVS; and it has been
> possible to dpkg-buildpackage it using that directory for a long
> time ( at least since 26 Feb 2001); Darius Pietrzak manages those files
So what? I know some applications with a debian directory in CVS
but with a different debian packaging in Debian.
> 0bis) Darius Pietrzak has filed an ITP for mplayer in Debian wnpp [3]
So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
> 1) Christian Marillat has released many packages (the first on 26 Feb 2001,
> according to the changelog); but
>
> 1a) he has not obtained permission from the authors: quite on the
> opposite, the authors had asked to NOT package mplayer [1] [2]
If you don't have permission to redistribute software as a Debian
package, it is not free software. Obtaining permission is just
a matter of courtesy.
> 2a) the different parts of the source code of mplayer were subject to
> different licenses, and this prohibited a binary packaging of
> them all together [2]
That's why it has not been in Debian so far.
>
>
> > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
> > means.
>
> you don't seem to have read the policy: it clearly states
>
> "We reserve the right to restrict files from being included anywhere in
> our archives if
> * their use or distribution would break a law,
> * there is an ethical conflict in their distribution or use,
> * we would have to sign a license for them, or
> * their distribution would conflict with other project policies."
It has nothing to do with the ongoing discussion. I didn't talk
at all about not having it in Debian.
You're just repackaging something that has already been packaged.
> and in the mantainer's guide [4]:
> # you should contact program's author(s) to check if they agree with
> packaging it. It is important to be able to consult with author(s)
> about the program in case of any program specific problems, so don't
> try to package unmaintained pieces of software.
Yes, you _should_, not you _must_. Please read it more carefully next
time.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lib sdl
- From: Andrea Mennucc <debian@Tonelli.sns.it>
- Re: lib sdl
- From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
- References:
- lib sdl
- From: Andrea Mennucc <debian@Tonelli.sns.it>
- Re: lib sdl
- From: jmarant@nerim.net (Jérôme Marant)
- Re: lib sdl
- From: Andrea Mennucc <debian@Tonelli.sns.it>