Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp> writes: > * gpgp should be in main (gpgp contains no crypto code --- all crypto things > are done by calling gpg) So gpgp should be where gnupg is. Today that's main, you're right on that. > I admit seahorse is better than gpgp, but gpgp seems rather popular > according to popcon, so I want to package gpgp again. The problem is that I hear gpgp is dead upstream. So unless someone (you?) takes up upstream maintainership, maybe it is still better for its users to migrate to seahorse. They can do this at their own pace, of course, as nobody will rip the old gpgp package from their harddisk. > What version number should I use (0.4-8?), and where should I upload > (main or non-US)? 0.4-7 should be fine, too, but 0.4-8 is safe. It should go to main unless one of the following is true: * depends on anything in non-US, * contains algorithms patented in the US, * or fails the DFSG (but that's another kettle of fish). -- Robbe
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature