On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:49:06AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > I admit seahorse is better than gpgp, but gpgp seems rather popular > > according to popcon, so I want to package gpgp again. > > The problem is that I hear gpgp is dead upstream. So unless > someone (you?) takes up upstream maintainership, maybe it is still > better for its users to migrate to seahorse. They can do this at their > own pace, of course, as nobody will rip the old gpgp package from > their harddisk. Last time I checked (It was not yesterday), gpa was better than seahorse. Christophe -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E Ce que l'on conçoit bien s'énonce clairement, Et les mots pour le dire arrivent aisément. Nicolas Boileau, L'Art poétique
Attachment:
pgpjelPwyEdGC.pgp
Description: PGP signature