Re: build failures & compiler versions

To: Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: build failures & compiler versions
From: "Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 06:58:00 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 15809.6856.363224.76429@laptank.occamsrazor.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021031031531.GB17508@netexpress.net>
References: <[🔎] 20021030170853.GA1179@gashuffer.lobefin.net> <[🔎] 20021030180231.GB14676@netexpress.net> <[🔎] 15808.41465.432888.733218@laptank.occamsrazor.net> <[🔎] 20021031031531.GB17508@netexpress.net>

On Oct 30, Steve Langasek (vorlon@netexpress.net) wrote:
 > So, gcc 2.95 is still supposed to be what s390 uses.  Sounds like someone
 > has "tweaked" the s390 buildd.

Who can I ask to untweak the s390 buildd, and get my package rebuilt?

Thanks.

-- 
Neil L. Roeth

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: build failures & compiler versions
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

References:
- build failures & compiler versions
  - From: Stephen Gran <steve@lobefin.net>
- Re: build failures & compiler versions
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: build failures & compiler versions
  - From: "Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>
- Re: build failures & compiler versions
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Sponsor request for gkrellmlaunch
Next by Date: Re: Packaging Trainee Engineer
Previous by thread: Re: build failures & compiler versions
Next by thread: Re: build failures & compiler versions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread