[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: build failures & compiler versions



On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:22:33PM -0500, Neil L. Roeth wrote:
> On Oct 30, Steve Langasek (vorlon@netexpress.net) wrote:
>  > The default compiler on alpha is still gcc 2.95, to the best of my
>  > knowledge.  If the autobuilders are using 3.x, this is not reflected in
>  > the default package layout for the architecture.

> Where does one find the "default package layout for the architecture"?  I am
> trying to figure out why the build daemon on s390 tried (and failed) to build
> my package with 3.2, yet the unstable chroot on trex has 2.95.4 (with which it
> builds fine).

If you're a DD, madison on auric will give you the full listing of what's
considered current[1]:

$ madison gcc|grep unstable
       gcc | 2:2.95.4-17 |      unstable | alpha, arm, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
       gcc |  2:2.96-19 |      unstable | ia64
       gcc |  2:3.0.4-8 |      unstable | hppa
       gcc |    2:3.1-1 |      unstable | hurd-i386
$

So, gcc 2.95 is still supposed to be what s390 uses.  Sounds like someone
has "tweaked" the s390 buildd.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

[1] If not, probably by checking package versions on your local Debian
mirror.

Attachment: pgpOuypS0SwtX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: