Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
> It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
It's a smart hack. As is the "ftp.debian.org" or "lists.debian.org"
> This has also a drawback: reconstructing history of threads between
> applicant and sponser will sooner become a pain.
Huh ? Those mails were never public before ... all information about a
package in a single bug, I find it quite convenient to see the
evolution of the sponsored package.
> Is currently a pain also to crawl in bug report pages for package with
> an huge number of reported bug.
Yes, that's exactly why it's a bad idea to integrate it in the wnpp
> Maybe you can provide some access statistics for the original CGI
> sponsorhip pages ...
I have no access statistics as it's not my machine. But it's not
relevant information anyway.
> How many bugs (and related thread) you think such a page can have?
The current CGI lists a total of 80 sponsoree. 20 of them currently have a
sponsor. I guess that we can easily have 60 bugs in the "looking for a
sponsor" list and 60 more in the "currently sponsored" list.
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com