Re: architecture in script
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 11:02:44AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> >The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration files. I
> >want to create a symlink from the generic name to the correct
> >(architecture-dependent) one.
>
> Could you tell us that makes sence?
It makes perfect sense if the package he's talking about is
Architecture: all.
> Please don't add architecture dependencies in packages.
As long as there is a fallback case for when the architecture isn't
recognized, there is no problem.
Personally I might be inclined to make the package Architecture: any in
this case, though.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: