On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > I intend to rename the glut packages from > glutg3 > glutg3-dev > to > libglut3 > libglut-dev > to follow the convention for library package naming. > > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content, I am not sure but isn't it better to use 'Provides: glutg3' instead of providing a package glutg3 with no content. Christophe > that depends on libglut3. I've done similar for glutg3-dev and libglut-dev. > > Does anyone have any comments or suggestions about this plan? Does it suck, > is there a better way to do it and still provide a smooth upgrade, so > developers depending on the glut libraries aren't shafted? > > -- > jaq@spacepants.org http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E Cats are intented to teach us that not everything in nature has a function. --Garrison Keillor
Attachment:
pgpqxUE605ryT.pgp
Description: PGP signature