[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-orphaning package

Martin Sj|gren <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se> writes:

[filing for removal of old gap packages]
> That is probably a good course of action, but I think it would be a
> bad<tm> idea to do it before the new gap4 packages have hit unstable,
> which they haven't done yet.
> So, should I wait, or "re-orphan" it in the meantime?

I don't think re-orphaning makes much sense. It could only induce
other people to make the same mistake. I say, post a short summary of
the issues to the bug, and keep it in ITA.


Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: