[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: undocumented(7)

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 06:23:21PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:

> Simple question for the day:
> Should a package that has a symlink to undocumented(7) also have a Depends:
> on the package that contains undocumented(7) (manpages)? It seems silly to
> me that a package could have a symlink to a non-existant man page in place
> of its own non-existant man page.

undocumented(7) is in the manpages package (Priority: important).  It seems
sensible to allow users to remove this package without breaking anything, and
if they care enough to remove the manpages package, they probably won't miss

 - mdz

Reply to: