[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Procedural clarification

On 06-Jul-2001 Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
>> ready when you apply.  So if you have a package ready for submission and
>> peer
>> review, submit an application.
> Really? The entry form at the NM corner has this scary warning:
> ->
> PLEASE NOTE: If you are unable to answer Yes to all of the questions
> asked, you are not yet ready to apply to the New Maintainer process. If
> you answer "yes" anyway, your AM may choose to send you back to the
> sponsorship system or to put your application on hold for three months
> until you are ready.
> <-
> So which is it? I've already created the packages I'm going to maintain,
> but I don't have my GPG key signed yet, nor do I have an advocate.
> What's the next step?
> Thanks for clearing up my confusion.

seems the text has changed since I was last involved with NM.  Follow the NM

I think there are ways around the signed key (you have to have a key though).

Reply to: