Re: Procedural clarification
On 06-Jul-2001 Neil Conway wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work
>> ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and
>> peer
>> review, submit an application.
>
> Really? The entry form at the NM corner has this scary warning:
>
> ->
> PLEASE NOTE: If you are unable to answer Yes to all of the questions
> asked, you are not yet ready to apply to the New Maintainer process. If
> you answer "yes" anyway, your AM may choose to send you back to the
> sponsorship system or to put your application on hold for three months
> until you are ready.
> <-
>
> So which is it? I've already created the packages I'm going to maintain,
> but I don't have my GPG key signed yet, nor do I have an advocate.
> What's the next step?
>
> Thanks for clearing up my confusion.
>
seems the text has changed since I was last involved with NM. Follow the NM
pages.
I think there are ways around the signed key (you have to have a key though).
Reply to: