Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages
>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy@kaplowitz.org> writes:
Jimmy> That would be easier. I did sort of want to keep a Makefile in
Jimmy> place that is called Makefile, so that a simple "make" command
Jimmy> still works, but I guess that could be taken care of by a
Jimmy> symlink. Thanks for the suggestion.
You misunderstand. You still have a Makefile, and it has
targets
----------------------------------------------------------------------
binary-ssl:
$(MAKE) -f Makefile.with.ssl
binary-no-ssl:
$(MAKE) -f Makefile.without
binary: binary-ssl binary-no-ssl
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The top makefile is what arranges to build the ssl and no ssl
binaries in sequence, or build one, ot the other. No symlinks. No
sed. No copying back and forth.
manoj
--
Some people have a way about them that seems to say: "If I have only
one life to live, let me live it as a jerk."
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: