Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages
That would be easier. I did sort of want to keep a Makefile in place that is
called Makefile, so that a simple "make" command still works, but I guess that
could be taken care of by a symlink. Thanks for the suggestion.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:37:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <email@example.com> writes:
> Jimmy> Why is it not sufficient to do something like the following
> Jimmy> pseudo-code in debian/rules:
> [Delete hack with amke/cp/sed/make/cp back]
> Would it not be simpler just to use
> $(MAKE) -f Makefile.with.ssl
> $(MAKE) -f Makefile.without
> See, no sed, no copying back and forth, and one can build with
> or without ssl packages independently.
> I'm ZIPPY the PINHEAD and I'm totally committed to the festive mode.
> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C