Re: [users] Re: Where's lame
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 05:49:06PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't
> > be legally redistributed in binary form.
Which is why URL's to it aren't supposed to be mentioned on public lists :P
>
> deb http://lly.org/~rcw/private/lamer/ ./
I just broke this.
> I believe rcw still maintains this, I have it commented out, since I dont
> use lame anymore.
"Maintains" would be a severe overstatement, I don't think I've touched
anything in there in about a year. If someone wants to take over that, email
me privately. Preferably someone outside the US or Germany.
--
Robert Woodcock - rcw@debian.org
"* We used to try various strange things. Let's not."
-- seen in linux/fs/buffer.c
Reply to: