[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't 
> be legally redistributed in binary form.

deb http://lly.org/~rcw/private/lamer/ ./

I believe rcw still maintains this, I have it commented out, since I dont
use lame anymore.



                      Michael Beattie (mike@ethernal.org)

                        <SirDibos> Culus: are you awake?
                        <Culus> no
                Debian GNU/Linux....  Ooohh You are missing out!

Attachment: pgpPBmunbD3QG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: