Re: Non-Free License? (was Weird source tarballs)
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Non-Free License? (was Weird source tarballs)
- From: Bradley Bell <btb@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:26:19 -0700
- Message-id: <20010503192619.A6174@washington.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20010503202922.A387@apocalypse>; from eric@debian.org on Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:29:22PM -0400
- References: <20010502230055.C2235@apocalypse> <20010503103250.B5721@polya> <20010503202922.A387@apocalypse>
It looks like it is just making explicit the restrictions which already exist
in law (whatever those might be), and is not part of the license per se.
-brad
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:29:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the help... problem #2:
>
> there's a README in the documentation has a standard warranty
> disclaimer, but then it has this text:
>
> US Government Users Restricted Rights
> Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to
> restrictions set forth in FAR 52.227.19(c)(2) or subparagraph
> (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software
> clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 and/or in similar or successor
> clauses in the FAR or the DOD or NASA FAR Supplement.
> Unpublished-- rights reserved under the copyright laws of the
> United States. Contractor/manufacturer is Silicon Graphics,
> Inc., 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd., Mountain View, CA 94039-7311.
>
>
> Which seems to imply that US Government users have additional
> restrictions, which probably goes against point #6 of the DFSG, but i'm
> not sure what the restrictions are (and have no idea how to look them
> up). Should i put this non-free?
>
> * Julian Gilbey (J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk) wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:00:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > i'd like to package the opengl manpages... but there tarballs are a bit
> > > strange... they're .Z files to begin with, and they don't appear to have
> > > a version number (some other docs have 1.2 as a version, so i suppose i
> > > can assume this) and the files untar into a directory called
> > > "release". I'm guessing i'm going to have to rename and retar the
> > > directory, but i couldn't really find any policy on how much to
> > > change. Is it alright to let the thing untar into some other directory?
> >
> > Probably sufficient to uncompress it and gzip it:
> >
> > uncompress opengl-1.2.tar.Z
> > gzip -9 opengl-1.2.tar
> > mv opengl-1.2.tar.gz opengl_1.2.orig.tar.gz
> >
> > Then untar it (tar zxvf opengl_1.2.orig.tar.gz; mv release opengl-1.2),
> > do any changes you need (introduce debian/ directory etc.) and try
> > building it. dpkg-source is pretty intelligent these days, so you
> > probably don't need to worry about the directory name.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > --
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> > Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
> > Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
> > Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>
> Eric Dorland
> dorland@lords.com
> ICQ: #61138586
> 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
Reply to: