Re: Weird source tarballs
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Weird source tarballs
- From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 10:32:50 +0100
- Message-id: <20010503103250.B5721@polya>
- In-reply-to: <20010502230055.C2235@apocalypse>; from eric@debian.org on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:00:55PM -0400
- References: <20010502230055.C2235@apocalypse>
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:00:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> i'd like to package the opengl manpages... but there tarballs are a bit
> strange... they're .Z files to begin with, and they don't appear to have
> a version number (some other docs have 1.2 as a version, so i suppose i
> can assume this) and the files untar into a directory called
> "release". I'm guessing i'm going to have to rename and retar the
> directory, but i couldn't really find any policy on how much to
> change. Is it alright to let the thing untar into some other directory?
Probably sufficient to uncompress it and gzip it:
uncompress opengl-1.2.tar.Z
gzip -9 opengl-1.2.tar
mv opengl-1.2.tar.gz opengl_1.2.orig.tar.gz
Then untar it (tar zxvf opengl_1.2.orig.tar.gz; mv release opengl-1.2),
do any changes you need (introduce debian/ directory etc.) and try
building it. dpkg-source is pretty intelligent these days, so you
probably don't need to worry about the directory name.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: