Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 23:13:12 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001220231311.A3071@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 8766kelvnx.fsf@manon.intern.opera.no>; from tollef@add.no on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 8766kelvnx.fsf@manon.intern.opera.no>

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:50:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

> I am building fortunes-bofh-excuses - just a couple of data files for
> fortune.

Is there any reason why they shouldn't be included in fortune proper?

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>

References:
- _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>

Prev by Date: Re: How do I fix a wrong maintainer entry in a package?
Next by Date: Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
Previous by thread: Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
Next by thread: Re: _i386 changes file for binary-all package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread