Re: how best to maintain a patch
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> David Coe wrote:
>
> > We have a patch to ispell, submitted to one of the
> > open bugs, which upstream maintainer has decided
> > isn't important enough to incorporate ...
>
> Why not? ...
Upstream author says it's a glibc bug, debian people say
it's a glibc feature (i'm oversimplifying; you can read
about it at http://bugs.debian.org/35288 if you care).
> > I think I like the separate patch file better,
> > though, because it'll be easier ...
>
> There is a system for doing this (used in egcs and XFree86) which was
> written Adam Heath (IIRC) but it's not been released properly for
> general use yet due to lack of documentation.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Reply to: