Re: how to handle a few arch-indep files
Samuel Tardieu schrieb:
>
> On 13/04, Olaf Stetzer wrote:
>
> | my package mountapp is nearly ready, but a few questions are left:
> |
> | 1.) There are a few little pixmaps included with the sources,
> | which are installed to /usr/x11R6/share/mount.app/
> | Now, do I have to make a separate package for them (something sort
> | of support-package) or can I leave them in the binary package.
> | Personally, I feel that two packages for this little app is
> | a little overkill.
>
> I think you can make one package, especially if icons are needed to have
> mount.app work properly.
>
Ok, so I will leave it this way.
> | 2.) There are two binarys: mount.app and mount.conf. The latter is
> | normally invoked by mount.app directly, so do I need to call
> | dh_undocumented for this too or can I ignore the lintian-message
> | about binary without manpage? (mount.app has no mapage too.)
>
> You should not have mount.conf in the PATH if it's not intended for users.
> Put in under /usr/libexec for example (no need for a manpage), and make
> mount.app look for it there.
>
It is possible to run mount.conf independantly, but normally it is
invoked, when double-clicking inside the docking icon. So, leaving it
in the PATH is maybe better. But if I do so, what about the manpage
then?
Olaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Olaf Stetzer -- EC/JRC/Institute for Transuranium Elements --
- email to: stetzer@itu.fzk.de or ostetzer@mail.uni-mainz.de -
- concerning debian GNU/Linux: stetzer@debian.org -
-- "Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny." Frank Zappa --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: