Re: Licences ok?
> ;;; Written by Mark Kantrowitz, School of Computer Science,
> ;;; Carnegie Mellon University, October 1989.
>
> ;;; Copyright (c) 1989-95 by Mark Kantrowitz. All rights reserved.
>
> ;;; Use and copying of this software and preparation of derivative works
> ;;; based upon this software are permitted, so long as the following
> ;;; conditions are met:
> ;;; o no fees or compensation are charged for use, copies, or
> ;;; access to this software
> ;;; o this copyright notice is included intact.
> ;;; This software is made available AS IS, and no warranty is made about
> ;;; the software or its performance.
>
> This looks pretty non-free right?
Indeed, the "no fees or compensation" clause makes it so.
The next license has several strange clauses:
> However, all academic or commercial publication rights for CL-HTTP server in
> any form are hereby reserved.
I have no idea what this means.
> Additionally, all rights are reserved to any derivative works based on the
> Lisp source code in the CL-HTTP distribution, in particular but not limited to
> any automatic or manual translation of the source code into other computer
> languages or executables.
This makes the Lisp code non-free.
I have no idea why they want to forbid compilation of their code.
> In the meantime, the right to change this license for CL-HTTP in anyway at
> anytime is hereby reserved, any prior clauses notwithstanding.
This also makes it non-free in my book, but the DFSG is not clear about it.
As far as I'm concerned it makes the entire license meaningless; there's
nothing you can do with the code that they cannot revoke whenever they
feel like it.
> It looks free, right?
Not to me.
Richard Braakman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- References:
- Licences ok?
- From: "Peter.VanEynde" <s950045@hhipe.uia.ac.be>