Re: Packaging imlib

To: Luis Francisco Gonzalez <luisgh@cogs.susx.ac.uk>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging imlib
From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 21:24:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980217212437.37264@kuolema>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980217192059.13974@masca>; from Luis Francisco Gonzalez on Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 07:20:59PM +0000
References: <[🔎] 19980217192059.13974@masca>

On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 07:20:59PM +0000, Luis Francisco Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
> Imlib sources have support for x-based imlib in one directory and gdkimlib
> in another. The way I have decided to go about packaging this (is this 
> the way to go?) is to have a top-level debian/rules that calls a

You need to publish your intent on debian-devel.

Please coordinate with Sean E. Perry <shaleh@livenet.net> who
also intents to package it.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 /                 Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only /
/          proved it correct, not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth /

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging imlib
  - From: Luis Francisco Gonzalez <luisgh@cogs.susx.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
Next by Date: Hamm bootdisks - testing
Previous by thread: Packaging imlib
Next by thread: Re: Packaging imlib
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread