On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:31:23AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > This is perfectly in line with the request of ftpmaster to keep the > > debian/ dir "sensibly" small and I'm pretty sure ftpmaster would have > > been rejected the package if the data[...] > To me this looks like an intricate evasion of unclear policy > requirements. FTP masters and discussion on -devel@ suggested this solution. It is not an evasion. > 26 MB of uncompressed textual data is "sensibly" small to > me. But not to FTP masters. We started getting rejects and had to adjust accordingly. > Are there any actual guidelines from ftpmaster on what is not > "sensible"? Not really. > > You probably did not followed all GSoC mails we exchanged with Bilal > > but it was one of the first lessons we teached him. ;-) > > If they were exchanged in debian-med@, I clearly missed them. Full discussion: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/09/msg00197.html -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature