Re: libcifpp transition

["Maarten L. Hekkelman" <maarten@hekkelman.com>]

Hi Andrius,

Op 31-01-2022 om 14:49 schreef Andrius Merkys:
> This is purely informational. It says you probably should not attempt
> transitioning libcifpp and libpdb-redo at the same time.

Hmmm, that didn't work, had to update both to make this work.

> > Anyway, now someone needs to file that bug to ask for a time slot. Who
> > is supposed to do that? Is that me? Or does anyone else volunteer?

> It would be great if you could do that. You may use my recent openmm
> transition bug report [1] as a template. What is important in libcifpp
> case is to tell that you are planning to patch the new libcifpp to make
> it backwards-compatible with the old libcifpp.

OK, the transition for both has started, see [1]. But I wonder, what 
does the status 'partial' mean? Is there something I should do?

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcifpp.html

Best regards,
-maarten