Hey Pjotr,
all other 64bit platforms would be fine? Like PPC64, mips64el, sparc64, and riscv64? These are just unofficial platforms (https://wiki.debian.org/SupportedArchitectures) but I suggest not to exclude them.Hi Nilesh, Sambamba co-author here. On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:47:17AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:Hi, It came to my notice that sambamba does not list copyright holders, and copyrgiht holders of several files are missing. I wonder if this is a RC bug, since I've seen a few of these earlier, for example #823865 I fixed the copyright stuff, but along with that I did a bunch of other changes:I'll add those fixes upstream.- Repacked shunit2, since it makes no sense to vendor an embedded copy - Added autopkgtests - Minor changed to d/watch, d/salsa-ci.yml - Added d/gbp.conf - Fixed an override All changes on salsa Also, I see here[1] that sambamba builds only on amd64 and arm64 because of missing B-D - so should supported arches in d/control be changed to only these two?Yes, please. I know we aim for all architectures, but no one runs sambamba on less that 64 bits, so we have not supported that.
Similar changes in "Architecture" field in d/tests/control I do not have more time to spend with this package, so if @Andreas, @Etienne, someone else could revert/add/edit a few changes and sponsor me an upload, I'd really appreciate that provided this is an RC bug (which I think it is) [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sambamba NileshTell me what I can do upstream.
Praise the package on your home page with a badge once your are happy with it :)
https://badges.debian.net/badges/debian/unstable/sambamba/version.svg Cheers, Steffen