Re: Should sambamba be uploaded at this stage?
Hi Nilesh,
Sambamba co-author here.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:47:17AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It came to my notice that sambamba does not list copyright holders,
> and copyrgiht holders of several files are missing.
>
> I wonder if this is a RC bug, since I've seen a few of these earlier,
> for example #823865
>
> I fixed the copyright stuff, but along with that I did a bunch of other
> changes:
I'll add those fixes upstream.
> - Repacked shunit2, since it makes no sense to vendor an embedded copy
> - Added autopkgtests
> - Minor changed to d/watch, d/salsa-ci.yml
> - Added d/gbp.conf
> - Fixed an override
>
> All changes on salsa
>
> Also, I see here[1] that sambamba builds only on amd64 and arm64 because
> of missing B-D - so should supported arches in d/control be changed to
> only these two?
Yes, please. I know we aim for all architectures, but no one runs
sambamba on less that 64 bits, so we have not supported that.
> Similar changes in "Architecture" field in d/tests/control
>
> I do not have more time to spend with this package, so if @Andreas,
> @Etienne, someone else could
> revert/add/edit a few changes and sponsor me an upload, I'd really
> appreciate that provided this is an RC bug (which I think it is)
>
> [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sambamba
>
> Nilesh
Tell me what I can do upstream.
Pj.
Reply to: