Re: no report generation, likely not only for pigx-rnaseq Re: What happened to r-cran-jquerylib ?
Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 12:58:53PM +0100 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> Hi Andreas et al.,
> We should think about what it means for us not to have a current version
> of the DT cran package. For one, it kills the PIGX RNA-seq workflow.
What do you mean by "we should think"? All we need to do is getting
r-cran-jquerylib *properly*. Uploading a rejected package to new
without fixing the reasons for a reject is not speeding up things.
I layed out what I consider to have good chances to pass ftpmaster
inspection (see below). Before I start working on this please confirm
that you asked for rejection of the current upload.
> On 03.11.21 12:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi again Steffen,
> > I'd strongly recommend to ask for rejection of your upload to NEW
> > to not create extra hassle for ftpmaster.
> > Kind regards
> > Andreas.
> > Am Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:43:07PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 07:16:44PM +0100 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> > > > I just found there is a new upstream version. I'll upload it and then
> > > > likely see it in new.
> > > That will be not successfully, thought. My idea was to remove jquery
> > > 1.x and 2.x from the package and symlink to the Debian packaged version
> > > of jquerylib 3.x.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I did not managed to do this up to now. Feel free to
> > > beat me in it - but simply uploading a new version to new will just
> > > annoy ftpmaster.