[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CuteSV (Was: PyEnsembl - how does that help us?)





On Mon, 24 May, 2021, 11:00 am Andreas Tille, <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 01:26:47AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
> Should there be a bug report about the missing test data in the pypi
> tarball?

May be.  But to my observation it is very common that the PyPI tarball
is lacking something we can profit for our packaging.

Yeah, that's why I always dislike pulling from pypi.d.n or anything similar.
Often a lot of times, pypi doesn't vendor test files whereas GitHub does, and that alone looks a strong reason to pull from GitHub - atleast to me

That's why I
prefer the Github tarball - provided it is tagged which is unfortunately
not always the case.  Seems like fighting against windmills to teach
upstreams sometimes. :-(

Sure.
However I do have a workaround for that.
You can pull from GitHub upto the commit a version is tagged, and add a "git mode" with "pretty=<version in pypi>+git%cd.%h" in d/watch

Sure, it has its own demerits but maybe worth trying - to me it looks better than pypi tags

Nilesh

Reply to: