Re: libcifpp, libpdb-redo, density-fitness
Thanks for your suggestion, I might use this in a future project.
For now I found that I made an error in the test. I'm using Boost
testing framework and using this you can specify the tolerance, but it
was ignored. Eventually I found out that I specified the tolerance as a
double and then compared two floats. That's not going to work. After
specifying the tolerance as a float, the unit-test ran without problems.
Op 04-01-2021 om 19:23 schreef Étienne Mollier:
Maarten L. Hekkelman, on 2021-01-04 11:14:44 +0100:
The reason for i386 is that the tolerance for floating comparison in the
test code is too strict (i386 being 32bit has a different double outcome for
some calculations). That is something I need to fix in the testing code.
If that helps, I tried a trick I shamelessly stole from Adrian
Bunk, which seems to address the tolerance issue without an
entire review of the test suite. You could give a go to the
following snippet on top of your debian/rules, should you need
to buy yourself some time:
ifneq (,$(filter i386 m68k,$(DEB_BUILD_ARCH)))
This works on m68k too, if I trust the GCC manual. I haven't
checked closely, but I believe it may sacrifice performances on
these platforms though.
Maarten L. Hekkelman