Hi Oops, missed a part of the message. On 10-12-2020 11:00, Andreas Tille wrote: >> It seems that this didn't work on our armhf worker: >> https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kmc/testing/armhf/ >> >> The amd64 run didn't happen on the big box. > > In the kmc case I'm seriously wondering whether we should restrict > the architectures to those that are relevant in practice. It seems > to be in line with upstream and I'm tempted to follow Étienne's > suggestion to upgrade to kmc 3.x which does not even build on armhf > any more and remove the package for the non-building architectures. > > Étienne, would you mind pushing your patches to Git to proceed with > this plan? Shall I run the current package on our big amd64 host to check if it fails there and that part of problem is solved? I mean, I understand that there was a real problem with hosts that have lots of CPU's and I assume you support amd64. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature