Hello Andreas, Thanks for the nitpicking! I've had a moment of inactivity with this package, so I forgot why the patch was there. I now remember the patch I put there simply disables an erroneous assertion: AssertionError: Tuples differ: (3030000, 2) != (3030000, 2, void(b'\x00\x00\x00\x00')) I did this, and dh_missing, to speed up the packaging and should have really removed those before I emailed. Although, I am not sure how I can contact upstream and should have just written an email here about it. I still think this is a very trivial assertion issue, and the tuples compared are very similar with the exception of the extra void(...) element. Out of 63 tests, maybe it's still worth keeping the patch (given I add the description) until a future fix, or someone in the team can rectify this. What do you suggest? As for the manpage, the only other method really is writing manpages for the two scripts. Apart from the spelling mistakes which can be fixed, the manpage has quite a featureful and meaningful content of both the scripts and the library usage - although I agree this is a replication of the HTML documentation. Do you suggest I simply just write the manpages for the two scripts? Ahh, thanks! I wrote that in ~/.sbuildrc as flags for the lintian options and I see the extra information. Kind regards, Shayan Doust
Attachment:
0x6D7D441919D02395.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature