Re: RFS: king-probe
Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your work on this, Andreas.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:26:14PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is just a follow-up request for sponsorship for king-probe.
>
> As pointed out by FTPmaster, reference files weren't actually necessary for
> comparison. Besides, they can bloat the package and result in copyright
> issues too. So I have removed them and added their md5 hashes for
> comparison.
>
> Please review and sponsor.
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe
>
> Regards,
> Pranav
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:53 PM Pranav Ballaney <ballaneypranav@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've added autopkgtests to king-probe [1], along with some information
> > about their sources in debian/README.test.
> > I've also listed them in d/copyright but I don't know which license to use
> > for PDB files that I've used as input data.
> >
> > According to the wwPDB Usage Policy [2],
> > "Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free
> > of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both
> > non-commercial and commercial use. Users of the data should attribute the
> > original authors of that structural data."
> >
> > So if I attribute the original authors of the publication, which license
> > do I use?
> >
> > For the files used as references to run tests, I've attributed the
> > copyright to myself and released the files under the same license as the
> > package itself.
> > Please review my changes and specially take a look at d/README.test and
> > d/copyright and let me know what I should change there.
> >
> > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe
> > [2]: https://www.wwpdb.org/about/privacy
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pranav
> > ᐧ
> >
> ᐧ
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: