Re: RFS: smart-tools [ITP]
Hi,
just a short notice. Somehow the pristine-tar branch is broken.
The original tarball can not be extracted by `gbp buildpackage`.
I tried to fix this bit the watch file is not properly crafted.
If I try
uscan --verbose --force-download
I get
uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
May be somebody else can help - but I need some rest now and may
be the next two days. Since we have lots of new contributors I
guess you can get some help here. Sorry for leaving you alone
for some time with this issue and thanks for your contribution
anyway
Andreas.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:51:06AM +0900, Sao I Kuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the package:
> * smart-open (#956455)
>
> The packages are on:
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/smart-open
>
> The package is dependency of idseq-bench[1,2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/idseq-bench
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/956033
>
> The package does have two issues:
> * GCS: runtime dependencies are not packaged (google-cloud-storage
> and its deps).
> - I disabled the GCS related codes, and all the other tests
> are works well.
> - d/patches/exclude-gcs.patch
> * S3: test dependencies not packaged (moto and its deps).
> - I disabled the S3 related tests.
> - d/patches/exclude-moto-s3-test.patch
>
> Because of reverse dependency of this package (specially idseq-bench)
> is only using the feature for local filesystems, GCS and S3 related
> codes are unnecessary for now. So I disabled them. I mentioned this
> issue in d/README.source.
>
> I enabled all the tests not related with GCS and S3, are all passed
> well. The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild, and
> lintian-clean.
>
> Please consider to review and sponsor this. Any kind of suggestions
> are appreciated.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sao I Kuan
> saoikuan@gmail.com
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: