[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open issue with libbpp-core



Ok, everything tagged then:
bpp-core, seq, phyl, popgen, raa, seq-omics, phyl-omics, qt => v2.3.1
bppsuite => v2.3.1
bppphyview => v0.5.1
comap => v1.5.2
physamp => v1.0.1
maffilter => v1.2.1

Many thanks to you for your patience!

J.


On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
Hi Julien,

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote:
> We have now committed several fixes to the cmake files and increased the
> interface numbers in all libs (excepted the bpp-qt one, which did not
> change since the last version, only compatibility updates).
>
> Everything is on the master branch, but I have not tagged the new
> versions... would there be a way to check that everything is in order
> before doing so? It seems to me that making a new version number and tag
> after each bug fix is rather ineffective... or maybe I should make a
> temporary tag only for testing purpose (sthg like v2.3.1-pre1?)

I've tested to build bpp-core which looks OK and I was also able to
successfully build bpp-seq using the package resulting from the above
build process.  I think it is fine to set a tag at this stage.

Kind regards and thanks for your cooperation

       Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de



--
Julien Y. Dutheil, Ph-D
0 (+49) 4522 763 298

§ Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
Molecular Systems Evolution
Department of Evolutionary Genetics
Plön -- GERMANY

§ Institute of Evolutionary Sciences - Montpellier
University of Montpellier 2 -- FRANCE

Reply to: