Re: It is out! Aw: Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?
Yes - you can register your workflows at bio.tools. A workflow can, after all, be considered just a tool with an input and
output. Noone asked until now, though, so there may be some workflow-specific metadata that we don't currently capture
(but can extend biotoolsXSD for it).
As for serving as a repo for CWL files, that's an open question. I'd say bio.tools probably shouldn't do it, but it can of
course point to such.
Cheers
Jon
> Please see https://wiki.debian.org/CommonWorkflowLanguage which is some very bare bones Debian-tailored portal to the
> CWL, I tend to think. Please extend at leisure. A question missing on that page may be:
> Q: How do I find a good workflow for my problem? Idea of an answer: The CWL per se is a language in which the workflow
> can be formulated. It in particular invites to reuse partial workflow to adapt to local problems, but it is not a workflow
> repository. But, those shall surface at different places. For instance SeqAnswers should provide such. Or we can look at
> transforming what myExperiment.org is collecting. And others. Is there something that can already be said about it?
> Best, Steffen Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2016 um 08:36 Uhr
> Von: "Michael Crusoe"
> An: "Andreas Tille" , debian-med@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?
> While the Common Workflow Language grew out of the bioinformatics community it has seen uptake in the neuroimaging
> community and is theoretically useful in other fields and outside science. Sâm, 13 feb. 2016, 07:53, Andreas
> Tille a scris: On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:39:39AM +0000, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> > Thanks for the reminder :-)
> >
> > Go for it!
> >
> > The draft package is at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/cwltool.git
> > [ I just pushed it ]
>
> I'm not sure whether cwltool belongs to the Debian Med tasks - at least
> the description does not contain a hint that makes me sure. Please
> consider adding it at your preference (possibly after enhancing the
> description to make it more clear that it is a tool for biologists).
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
> -- Michael R. Crusoe CWL Community Engineer crusoe@ucdavis.edu Common Workflow Language project University
> of California, Davis https://impactstory.org/MichaelRCrusoe http://twitter.com/biocrusoe
Reply to: