Please see
https://wiki.debian.org/CommonWorkflowLanguage
which is some very bare bones Debian-tailored portal to the CWL, I tend to think. Please extend at leisure.
A question missing on that page may be:
Q: How do I find a good workflow for my problem?
Idea of an answer: The CWL per se is a language in which the workflow can be formulated. It in particular invites to reuse partial workflow to adapt to local problems, but it is not a workflow repository. But, those shall surface at different places. For instance SeqAnswers should provide such. Or we can look at transforming what myExperiment.org is collecting. And others.
Is there something that can already be said about it?
Best,
Steffen
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2016 um 08:36 Uhr
Von: "Michael Crusoe" <michael.crusoe@gmail.com>
An: "Andreas Tille" <andreas@an3as.eu>, debian-med@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?
While the Common Workflow Language grew out of the bioinformatics community it has seen uptake in the neuroimaging community and is theoretically useful in other fields and outside science.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:39:39AM +0000, Michael Crusoe wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder :-)
>
> Go for it!
>
> The draft package is at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/cwltool.git
> [ I just pushed it ]
I'm not sure whether cwltool belongs to the Debian Med tasks - at least
the description does not contain a hint that makes me sure. Please
consider adding it at your preference (possibly after enhancing the
description to make it more clear that it is a tool for biologists).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--