Re: Mentioning EDAM files in DebianMed Policy
Folks
The link to OLS was to a deprecated ontology browser running an ancient version of EDAM.
Please use this one instead (it's in beta, so go steady):
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=EDAM
Alternatively you can use this:
http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/EDAM/
ps. both now include EDAM_1.13 just released post-hackathon. Thanks for the hard work !
Cheers
Jon
> Hi Fabian,
>
> thanks for the very helpful and needed hint. I was waiting a bit since
> Michael intended to work on the structure of the policy a bit and I did
> not wanted to shot on a moving target. Michael, could you comment on
> this how and where you would like to see this information?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Fabian Kl�tzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The new edam files should also be mentioned in our team policy. Below is
>> a quick mock up; But we might also need to write a proper spec.
>>
>> Best,
>> Fabian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ## debian/upstream/edam
>>
>> This is a machine-readable file to categorize where in life-science this
>> package has its application. The categories themselves come from EDAM
>> and are arranged in YAML format. Check the [EDAM Ontology
>> Browser](http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=EDAM)
>> for terms that might fit the package.
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
Reply to: