Re: libsis-jhdf5-java ok

[Tim Booth <avarus@fastmail.fm>]

I'm done with committing, so please go ahead and do whatever you like.
If you prefer to shift the version control to GIT at this point that's
fine by me.

TIM

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 13:32 +0000, olivier sallou wrote:
> Ok so if it is ok for you, i will remove those files from d/source and
> updates patches DEP3 headers, and test again.
> 
> 
> Le ven. 21 août 2015 14:54, Tim Booth <avarus@fastmail.fm> a écrit :
> 
>         I thought that bit was your doing?  Maybe I broke it somehow.
>         All I
>         intended to do in that package since you worked on it was move
>         the
>         libraries into /usr/lib/jni and to remove the .0.0.0
>         extension.  Other
>         than that I was mainly working on the -jhdf5 package.
>         
>         TIM
>         
>         On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 12:37 +0000, olivier sallou wrote:
>         > regarding libsis-base-java dpkg-buildpackage issue, I think
>         it is
>         > related to debian/source/c (/java) content.
>         > Why did youpout those files there?
>         >
>         >
>         > This is certainly due to the fact I checkout the code from
>         svn, and
>         > timestamp/... are different from the ones in source/c
>         >
>         >
>         > Can't we remove those?
>         >
>         >
>         > Olivier
>         >
>         > Le ven. 21 août 2015 à 14:20, olivier sallou
>         > <olivier.sallou@gmail.com> a écrit :
>         >
>         >         Hi,
>         >         I took code and could built successfully the package
>         on sid.
>         >
>         >
>         >         Remains DEP3 and get-orig-source and polishing
>         >
>         >
>         >         Regarding libsis-base-java, I could not build using
>         >         svn-buildpackage it failed on cp to source/c while
>         it is fine
>         >         with a debian/rules binary....
>         >
>         >
>         >         Olivier
>         
>         --
>         Nothing is inherently mysterious - nothing that actually
>         exists, that
>         is.  If I am ignorant about a phenomenon, that is a fact about
>         my state
>         of mind, not a fact about the phenomenon; to worship a
>         phenomenon
>         because it seems so wonderfully mysterious, is to worship your
>         own
>         ignorance.
>         
>           - Eliezer Yudkowsky
>         

-- 
Nothing is inherently mysterious - nothing that actually exists, that
is.  If I am ignorant about a phenomenon, that is a fact about my state
of mind, not a fact about the phenomenon; to worship a phenomenon
because it seems so wonderfully mysterious, is to worship your own
ignorance.

  - Eliezer Yudkowsky