Perhaps king-suitename and king-probe would be good names for the packages (or suitename-king. and probe-king) Clearly the probe executable can't be called probe because as Andreas has pointed out this name is already in use. But I like the admittedly inconsistent idea of retaining the suitename executable name because at least that change won't need to be propagated into the King source.
A possible added advantage of this type of naming would be to differentiate between the program version found on the kinemage site which are suitable as both standalone and king callable and the the latest versions in the rlabduke repo at github which may or may not be king-callable.
I'll try to see if I can get a word regarding strong preference from the authorship group and if successful forward their preference to this list.
Thanks for this discussion and response
Michael