Re: fasttree: hard-coded limit on branch length precision leads to erroneous results
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:19:18PM +0100, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> C> Actually, I have been a bit confusing: I did not mean uploading
> C> version 2.1.7-2 to Wheezy, but to apply the patches to 2.1.4-1 as
> C> a Stable update if it makes sense.
>
> Ah, OK. There would be 2 problems with this: a) It's not clear whether
> 2.1.4 + patch will work OK. b) It'd be messy to figure out the 2.1.4-1
> content because of missing tags. So 2.1.7-2 backport yes, fixed 2.1.4-1
> no.
I personally would consider a 2.1.8 backport to all relevant releases
more usefull than spending time on old versions? Am I missing something?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: