Re: fasttree: hard-coded limit on branch length precision leads to erroneous results
>>>>> "C" == Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:
C> Le Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:10:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:01:29AM +0100, Roland Fehrenbacher
>> wrote:
>>
>> > C> Do you think it would be possible to backport the change
>> > C> for Wheezy as well ?
>> >
>> > I guess so. We have already built the package for
>> > Qlustar/Wheezy, so no principal problem. We'd have to rebuild
>> > it with a different version number suitable for the backports
>> > repo, but that's done in no time. Just a question how the
>> > upload process to the official backport repo works. I'm not
>> > familiar with that.
>>
>> I admit I never cared about backports and I was hoping that
>> somebody from the team would care for it. Unfortunately this was
>> not (yet) the case and I'm crossing thumbs that this will become
>> better in the future.
C> Actually, I have been a bit confusing: I did not mean uploading
C> version 2.1.7-2 to Wheezy, but to apply the patches to 2.1.4-1 as
C> a Stable update if it makes sense.
Ah, OK. There would be 2 problems with this: a) It's not clear whether
2.1.4 + patch will work OK. b) It'd be messy to figure out the 2.1.4-1
content because of missing tags. So 2.1.7-2 backport yes, fixed 2.1.4-1
no.
Best,
Roland
-------
http://www.q-leap.com / http://qlustar.com
--- HPC / Storage / Cloud Linux Cluster OS ---
Reply to: