Re: Packing of Fw4spl
Hi,
it seems Mathieu is on vacation since he usually responds quite quickly.
So I had a look myself and after building the current package I noticed
lintian errors about compressed JS files in the source without a
corresponding source. Since these files are not needed in the binary
package I simply removed them using Files-Excluded in d/copyright (see
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/vxl/trunk/). After
doing so I was running into a (from my point of view totally unrelated
cmake issue:
dh_auto_configure # See bug: 708131
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:184 (MESSAGE):
You cannot have a + in your binary path
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:187 (MESSAGE):
You cannot have a + in your source path
-- Performing Test VCL_HAS_BOOL
-- Performing Test VCL_HAS_BOOL - Success
If you are interested in vxl it would be nice if you could try to track
this down. My cmake experience is extremely limited and the line
numbers of any of the CMakeLists.txt files in the source do not look
suspicious to me. I could easily help uploading a working package but I
do not want to spend my time in cmake issues as long there is no really
strong interest in this package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:12:31PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Corentin DESFARGES wrote:
> > >> VXL (which is obsolete and contains VGL, V3P, VCL...)
> > > Could you please be a bit more verbose? According to SourceForge
> > the version in Debian (1.17.0) is the latest. Has the project
> > moved? What exactly do you mean by "contains VGL, V3P, VCL..." ?
> >
> > I wanted to say that VXL is not available yet on Debian Jessie, and
> > I'm using this version of Debian to have Boost 1.55.
>
> Ahhh, got it. The package is currently hanging around in experimental
> only which is not helpful. Mathieu (in CC) was basically responsible
> and I noticed that his last entry in d/changelog was.
>
> vxl (1.17.0-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>
> * Remove self from uploaders
>
> -- Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:36:12 +0100
>
>
> Mathieu, could you clarify your motivation?
>
>
> > By "contains
> > VGL, V3P, VLC...", I mean that libvxl1.14 contains some libraries
> > needed by fw4spl, and this package isn't available on Jessie.
> > I've solved this issue by adding the Wheezy's apt repositories on my
> > system and it works, but I'm not sure that's the good way to
> > proceed...
>
> Definitely not since we are building against unstable. I'll have a look
> into the package but hope for some clarification by Mathieu in the mean
> time.
>
> > >> and Camp (https://github.com/greenjava/camp/).
> > > From a very quick view this looks like a straightforward packaging
> > project.
> >
> > As I said to Steffen, I think that we will pack Camp to solve the problem.
>
> Cool.
>
> > > If you would like to invest some time into the packaging work you are
> > more than welcome to do this in the Debian Med team. We have some
> > documentation[1] how to work in the team and if you need some general
> > packaging skills we have a mentoring project[2].
> >
> > I'll take a look at these links, thank you!
>
> PLease keep on asking here if something might remain unclear.
>
> > I continue to work on it. I've an other small question : fw4spl is
> > based on a association of "Bundles". The actual politic of the IRCAD
> > (who develops fw4spl) is that each bundle is an part of software, a
> > module, and once built, these bundles contain libraries, icons,
> > pictures... I suppose that I know the answer, but, is it possible,
> > on a Debian system, to install a package who deploy these bundles
> > into /usr/lib/my_pckg ? Else it means that fw4spl need a very big
> > revision to be adapted for Debian...
>
> I'm not sure whether I understand your question correctly but I tend to
> answer yes. If I see the packaging (= technical implementation of your
> packaging idea) I can say for sure. In any case lintian is your friend
> to teach you about policy questions. Just run it on your resulting
> package. :-)
>
> > Thanks for your attention,
>
> You are welcome
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20140819151231.GA27487@an3as.eu">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20140819151231.GA27487@an3as.eu
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: