[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ARB 6.0 released



Hi Roland,

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:42:18PM +0200, rf@q-leap.de wrote:
>  
> Good attitude! Always looking for synergies. In this case, I'd have to
> disappoint you though: Our backport packages are built with different
> conventions than standard Debian backport ones, and we definitely don't
> have the resources to manage two variants of them. It's already a lot of
> work to manage two distros (soon 3) in various flavors, so we'll have to
> capitulate at this point.

OK.  However, I'm curious what "different conventions" these might be
just for the sake of interest.
 
>     Andr> This looks like a vote: "Yes, please package modules" to me.
>     Andr> Would you mind injecting modules into Debian Med Git (perhaps
>     Andr> but not necessarily Debian Science Git in case you don't mind
>     Andr> joining another team)?
>  
> Well the vote has to come from somebody else, since Qlustar already has
> it :)

Well, a vote is a vote (in terms if the package is considered useful or
not). :-)

> We'd put it into the DebMed repo. Joining another team is not
> feasible for us right now(see above).

That's perfectly fine.
 
>     Roland> packages. We'll probably also package lmod soon which is
>     Roland> supposed to be more advanced.
> 
>     Andr> Sounds good.  I'm in favour of officially packaging "anything
>     Andr> that makes sense to scientists"
> 
> Ok. It's on the list :)

:-)

Kind regards

       Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: