Re: Bug#728797: ITP: python-mne -- Python modules for MEG and EEG data analysis
Hi,
just builded successfully and pushed some slight polishing changes.
Would you mind writing a man page for mne? Moreover you did not yet
commented my suggestion to drop the term "python" inside the software
name.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:46:07PM +0100, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> hi,
>
> > I adapted packaging in Git to 0.7~rc3 and we are down to only one failed
> > test:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > TOTAL 20945 8173 61%
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ran 290 tests in 366.180s
> >
> > FAILED (SKIP=89, failures=1)
> > make[2]: *** [test-no-sample] Error 1
> >
> > See full build log attached. Seems it is either
> >
> > Test Yule-Walker against statsmodels ... SKIP: XFailed Test
>
> this was not a failure. I made the message more informative though.
>
> > but more probably:
> >
> > Test file downloading ...
>
> this one is the failure. I tried something to make it work.
>
> and pushed tag v0.7rc4
>
> the test should pass without internet connection.
>
> see:
>
> https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/blob/master/mne/tests/test_utils.py#L202
>
> >> > occures in the build log. You need to know that the package build
> >> > process needs to run on a computer without internet connection and you
> >> > can/should easily simulate this by using pdebuild. Since you are
> >> > upstream you might be able to inject some option to the tests to ignore
> >> > all those that need to download something.
> >>
> >> it's what test-no-sample should hopefully do.
> >
> > Tried this (see d/rules in Git).
>
> you commented:
>
> #MNE_SKIP_SAMPLE_DATASET_TESTS=true \
> # xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-num=20 -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24
> -ac +extension GLX +render -noreset" \
> # $(NOSETESTS) mne
>
> which was "supposed" to do the job and also avoid failure when running
> tests requiring X such as tests relying on mayavi if present.
>
> the xvfb-run should not be in the Makefile.
>
> let me know if tests pass now. If not I'll comment the test.
>
> thanks again
>
> Alex
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: