[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sponsoring request: libmialm (houskeeping)



Hello Andreas, 

thanks for the pointers, I guess because it was not really adding code,
I got a bit lax. After running lintian with -I -i I saw all the errors
and I corrected the package accordingly. 

Changes are now

  * Add debug package
  * Add symbols file
  * Change vcs entries to canonical names

best regards, 
Gert 


On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 15:18 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Gert,
> 
> thanks for updating the package.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:58:25PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > Dear all, 
> > 
> > I figured that it would make sense to have a debug package for the
> > library so I've updated the package accordingly. 
> > 
> > Changes: 
> > 
> >   * Add debug package
> 
> I builded the package and noticed some remaining lintian information
> (possibly only visible if you really use the latest lintian from
> unstable).
> 
> $ lintian libmialm_1.0.7-2_amd64.changes 
> I: libmialm source: duplicate-short-description libmialm-dev libmialm3-dbg
> I: libmialm source: vcs-field-not-canonical http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/libmialm.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/libmialm.git
> I: libmialm source: vcs-field-not-canonical git://git.debian.org/debian-med/libmialm.git git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/libmialm.git
> I: libmialm3: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmialm.so.3.0.0
> 
> I think lintian is correct in asking you for a different short
> description for the dbg package here.  I have mixed feelings about the
> canonical Vcs fields but given that this check has made its way into
> lintian I tend to regard it even if I regard this as a very big nuisance
> for all maintainers of packages in Vcs.
> 
> The last warning about the symbols-control file is an issue I formerly
> ignored but I learned meanwhile that it might make sense to provide this
> in the packaging.  Just use `lintian -i -I` to get more verbose
> information with links to Wiki pages where it is sufficiently explained
> what you need to do to accomplish this.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: