Re: Microbiomeutil and chimeraslayer as dependency of Qiime
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:34:14AM +0200, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
>
> microbiomeutil (20101212-2) unstable; urgency=low
Done.
> We all do not like working with epochs, I presume.
I personally do not have a problem with epochs but I respect your
feelings. :-)
> I would also like to point
> to the backports.debian.org page on packaging instructions
> at http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3
Good hint. I was also wondering whether it is a good idea to use the
"ubuntu" string inside BioLinux packages. As a (plain) Ubuntu user
I would be a bit confused to see this name in the version if a package
is not really part of Ubuntu but just an Ubuntu derivative. So if
I were you and I would create versions for BioLinux most probably
this would be the best idea for versioning:
<version>~biolinux-<pkgversion> or
<version>-0biolinux<pkgversion>
A positive side effect is that people who stumbly by chance about such
package will notice the BioLinux string and might become interested in
it ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: