Re: Packaging InVesalius
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 05:59:45PM -0200, Thiago Franco de Moraes wrote:
>>
>> Now the rename is working. He is renaming the tarball to invesalius_3.0~b3.orig.tar.gz. To make it work I used uversionmangle instead of dversionmangle. The folder inside this tarball has the name "invesalius3-3.0-b3" instead of "invesalius_3.0~b3", is this a problem?
>
> The folder name inside the tarball is no problem. If we do not repack
> the tarball we just take what is inside (sometimes there are quite
> strange choices of names - we simply leave this as is.)
>
>> The Lintian returns two warnings:
>>
>> W: invesalius: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/invesalius/LICENSE.txt.gz > It's because the package has two license files, one in English and other in Portuguese. The Portuguese version is because a license must be in Portuguese to be recognized by the Brazilian government.
>
> That's a fair reason. I would suggest to rename it LICENSE.pt.txt (or
> LICENSE.pt.BR.txt at your preference) and to not compress this file
> (which can be done by override_dh_compress (you will find examples when
> greping for this string in SVN.) The debian/copyright file must not be
> compressed and I would consider the same reason for any translated
> license statement.
Done. I renamed to LICENSE.pt.txt
> You can create a lintian-overrides file to suppress the warning and
> also add a comment for the reason you have given above.
Done.
>> W: invesalius: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/invesalius-3.0 > If you think it's necessary, I can create a manpage to InVesalius.
>
> This would be great.
Done. I created a simple manpage. I must say that troff syntax is very ugly :)
> Kind regards and thanks for your work on this
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
Thanks!
Reply to: